Sack v. Lawton

2003 WL 22682043 (2003)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Sack v. Lawton

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
2003 WL 22682043 (2003)

  • Written by Lauren Petersen, JD

Facts

Kenneth Lawton (defendant) agreed to purchase a drawing by Rafael known as the Modello from Shirley Sack and Shirley D. Sack, Ltd. (plaintiffs) for $12,000,000. Sack’s agent, together with Lawton, executed a bill of sale for the drawing. Lawton never paid for the Modello drawing, and the drawing remained with Sack. Eventually, Sack tried to sell the drawing to another buyer, but she could not find a buyer willing to pay a comparable price. Sack was also concerned that the unfulfilled bill of sale would make it impossible to convey clear title to a new buyer. Sack and Shirley D. Sack, Ltd. sued Lawton for breach of contract, seeking $12,000,000 in damages for the purchase price of the drawing, plus interest and consequential damages. Lawton did not respond to the complaint, and the plaintiffs obtained a default judgment against Lawton. The only remaining issue was for the court to determine the appropriate amount of damages. Lawton did respond on this issue and contested the plaintiffs’ claim for damages.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Fox, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 804,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership