Sack v. Lawton
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
2003 WL 22682043 (2003)
- Written by Lauren Petersen, JD
Facts
Kenneth Lawton (defendant) agreed to purchase a drawing by Rafael known as the Modello from Shirley Sack and Shirley D. Sack, Ltd. (plaintiffs) for $12,000,000. Sack’s agent, together with Lawton, executed a bill of sale for the drawing. Lawton never paid for the Modello drawing, and the drawing remained with Sack. Eventually, Sack tried to sell the drawing to another buyer, but she could not find a buyer willing to pay a comparable price. Sack was also concerned that the unfulfilled bill of sale would make it impossible to convey clear title to a new buyer. Sack and Shirley D. Sack, Ltd. sued Lawton for breach of contract, seeking $12,000,000 in damages for the purchase price of the drawing, plus interest and consequential damages. Lawton did not respond to the complaint, and the plaintiffs obtained a default judgment against Lawton. The only remaining issue was for the court to determine the appropriate amount of damages. Lawton did respond on this issue and contested the plaintiffs’ claim for damages.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fox, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.