From our private database of 37,200+ case briefs...
Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400
Supreme Court of California
23 P.3d 1143 (2001)
Three unknown assailants beat and attempted to rape Marianne Saelzler (plaintiff) one afternoon while she was trying to deliver a FedEx package at a 28-building apartment complex owned by Advanced Group 400 (defendant). A propped-open security gate could have allowed access, but Saelzler could not identify whether her assailants were trespassers or residents. The property owners knew about recurring criminal activity in the area, including juvenile-gang activity, because a gang evidently located its headquarters in one of the buildings. Multiple crimes involving tenants had been reported, and the security manager acknowledged several assaults and actual or attempted rapes occurred on the property during the preceding year. Management inspected the security gates regularly and provided nighttime security patrols, but not daytime patrols. Saelzler brought a negligence action asserting that Advanced Group 400 knew dangerous persons frequented the premises but failed to provide adequate security or warnings to others. Saelzler’s security expert testified that additional security measures would have prevented the attack. The trial court granted summary judgment for Advanced Group 400 based on lack of proximate cause. The appellate court reversed, reasoning that Saelzler made a sufficient showing, based on a complete lack of required security measures, to shift the burden of proof to the owner for purposes of summary judgment. Advanced Group 400 appealed to the California Supreme Court.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Chin, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 630,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 630,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 37,200 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.