Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Sale v. Haitian Centers Council

Supreme Court of the United States
509 U.S. 155 (1993)


Facts

Haitian Centers Council (HCC), among others, are a group of Haitians as well as organizations who represent Haitians (collectively, plaintiffs) who were being detained at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba. The case arises out of an Executive Order issued by President Reagan and continued by Presidents Bush and Clinton. In 1981, the United States and Haiti entered into an agreement authorizing the U.S. Coast Guard to intercept boats coming from Haiti that were carrying undocumented aliens to the United States, and to send them back to Haiti. The agreement also established that the U.S. Government would not return any Haitians whom the U.S. authorities determined to qualify for refugee status. In 1991, a military coup in Haiti forced thousands of Haitians to flee the country and created a huge influx of aliens coming to the United States on dangerous sea voyages. Because the Coast Guard and the holding facilities for screening refugees became saturated, President Bush adopted an order to repatriate all fleeing Haitians without opportunity for them to establish refugee status, as was contemplated by the initial agreement. HCC filed suit against Sale, the Commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, among others (collectively, defendants), to challenge the Executive Order, contending it violated § 243(h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act and Article 33 of the United Nations Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees. The district court denied HCC’s injunction because it concluded that § 243 does not apply in international waters. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed, and the Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve a circuit split.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Dissent (Blackmun, J.)

The dissent section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or justice’s opinion.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.