Scott v. Bradford
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
606 P.2d 554 (Okla. 1979)
Norma Jo Scott (plaintiff) had surgery to remove tumors from her uterus. Thereafter, it was discovered that the surgery had caused a condition which allowed urine to leak from her bladder to her vagina. After three subsequent surgeries, the problem was fixed. Scott brought suit for medical malpractice against the surgeon, Bradford (defendant), claiming that if she had been properly informed of the surgery’s risks and possible alternatives, she would not have chosen surgery. The trial court gave the jury broad instructions regarding a surgeon’s duty to disclose such information, including that Bradford had a duty to disclose material risks of the surgery and feasible alternatives. The jury found that Bradford had adequately informed Scott. Scott appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Doolin, J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Barnes, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.