Scott v. Garfield
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
912 N.E.2d 1000 (2009)

- Written by Darius Dehghan, JD
Facts
Sherry Baker rented an apartment with a porch from Stuart and Ellen Garfield (defendants). Charles Scott (plaintiff), a friend of Baker’s, visited the apartment. When Scott was standing on the porch, the porch railing collapsed, and he fell to the ground, sustaining personal injuries. Subsequently, Scott filed suit against the Garfields, contending that they breached the warranty of habitability. The trial court found that the porch railing did not comply with the state building and sanitary codes and that Scott had suffered personal injuries as a result of the noncompliant railing. The court ruled that the Garfields had breached the warranty of habitability and awarded damages to Scott. The Garfields appealed to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ireland, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.