Scott v. State

291 Ga. 156 (2012)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Scott v. State

Georgia Supreme Court
291 Ga. 156 (2012)

JL

Facts

Steven Scott (defendant) was told by his 16-year-old niece that her mother’s boyfriend, Dan Smith, had molested her. Scott walked to a convenience store to get a beer and returned home to continue talking to his niece. The mother and boyfriend arrived to pick up the niece, and the mother went inside to talk to Scott. The mother told Scott that she did not believe the niece. Scott retrieved a handgun for his own protection and went to talk to Smith. According to Scott, when confronted, Smith stated, “she’s my b____, I can do whatever I want.” According to Scott, he then lost it, blacked out, and started shooting. The gunshots killed Smith. Scott was charged with felony murder and other charges. During the trial, the trial court ruled that Scott could not introduce evidence to prove provocation and refused to allow a jury instruction on manslaughter. Scott was convicted of felony murder, and he appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Thompson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 811,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership