Scribner v. Summers

84 F.3d 554 (1996)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Scribner v. Summers

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
84 F.3d 554 (1996)

  • Written by Tanya Munson, JD

Facts

The Scribners (plaintiffs) owned a property that bordered a steel-treating business owned by Jasco Sun-Steel Treating, Inc., John Summers, and Stephen Summers (Jasco) (defendants). Jasco used several large furnaces that would produce a sludge residue containing high levels of barium chloride that Jasco would wash off with water near the Scribners’ property. Jasco would also use jackhammers to break up old furnaces for transport. The residue of the washing and demolishing emptied into a swale, a structure like a drainage ditch, that ran downhill from Jasco’s property to an area adjacent to the Scribners’ property. In 1986, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation designated barium as a hazardous waste, and several years later indicted and convicted Jasco for violating the Environmental Conservation Law. The Jasco facility was registered as an ineffective hazardous-waste site. In 1991, the Scribners attempted to sell their property but could not because of the reputation of the Jasco facility. The Scribners claimed that Jasco’s waste products had contaminated their property and asserted claims under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) and common-law tort claims for strict liability, trespass, and private nuisance. The trial court concluded that the Scribners’ property was contaminated from high levels of barium that originated on Jasco’s property. The court granted the Scribners their response costs under CERCLA and determined that Jasco was responsible for the Scribners’ future response costs. The court held that the Scribners failed to prove any of their common-law tort causes of action. The Scribners appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McLaughlin, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership