Search King, Inc. v. Google Technology, Inc.

2003 WL 21464568 (2003)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
S
From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Search King, Inc. v. Google Technology, Inc.

United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
2003 WL 21464568 (2003)

Facts

Google Technology, Inc. (Google) (defendant) displayed search results based on an algorithm called PageRank, whereby web pages would be sorted according to their relevance to a given search query. Neither Google nor individual websites had the ability to control the ordering of search results, which was entirely controlled by PageRank’s algorithm. If PageRank ranked a website higher, that website would become more valuable because more people would click on it. Over the course of a year, a website run by Search King, Inc. (Search King) (plaintiff) had its PageRank rankings lowered. Search King claimed that this was a purposeful, malicious action by Google because Google began to see Search King as a competitor. Search King filed suit, alleging tortious interference with contractual relations. Google filed a motion to dismiss, contending that Search King had failed to state a claim.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Miles-Lagrange, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 802,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Cyberspace

Key Terms