Securities and Exchange Commission v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co.
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
401 F.2d 833 (1968)
Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. (TGS) began drilling on a site in Canada and found high mineral content. TGS decided that it would be desirable to purchase the site, but to make sure that it could purchase the site easily, TGS kept the results of the drilling quiet. When word of the site's high mineral content started to get out, TGS released a statement saying that the reports were exaggerated and that reports of the site's content were inconclusive. Four days later, TGS officially announced the discovery of a major copper-ore strike. In the four-day period between the release of the original statement and the announcement of the cooper-ore strike, the TGS secretary and a TGS engineer (defendants) bought TGS stock. Immediately after the official announcement, the TGS director (defendant) ordered shares of TGS stock. The director's son-in-law, a broker, also purchased shares for himself and his customers. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (plaintiff) started an investigation and eventually brought suit. After a bench trial, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York found, among other things, that the TGS secretary and engineer violated Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 because they traded based on material inside information. The secretary and engineer appealed this decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Additionally, because the TGS director traded after the disclosure of the information in the official announcement, the district court found no violation and dismissed the complaint as to the director. The SEC appealed this decision to the Second Circuit.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Waterman, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 726,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 726,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,700 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.