Shippitsa Ltd. v. Slack
United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas
2019 WL 2372687 (2019)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Shippitsa Ltd. (plaintiff) manufactured Phen375, a dietary supplement sold through Shippitsa’s website, phen375.com. Shippitsa contracted to advertise on MoreNiche (defendant), a website Andrew Jon Slack (defendant) operated. Users could click a link on MoreNiche that connected to phen375.com. When Shippitsa’s contract expired, the link connected to mixi.mn, another webpage Slack operated that said Phen375 was no longer available via that link and redirected to an alternate website. Shippitsa brought federal-law claims for trademark infringement and dilution, false designation of origin, cybersquatting, and racketeering in federal court in Texas. Because Slack resides in the United Kingdom and incorporated and headquartered MoreNiche there, Slack asserted the court lacked personal jurisdiction. The court applied the Zippo test, concluded mixi.mn was not commercial or interactive enough to support personal jurisdiction, and granted dismissal. Shippitsa requested reconsideration, arguing MoreNiche’s automatic redirection of users—including users in Texas—to a different website was enough to confer jurisdiction.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fitzwater, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.