Sierra Club v. Davies
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
955 F.2d 1188 (1992)

- Written by Colette Routel, JD
Facts
In 1976, the State of Arkansas received a grant from the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act (LWCFA) to purchase a parcel of land that became known as the Crater of Diamonds State Park (park). In 1987, a state statute authorized the Arkansas Department of Parks and Tourism (department) to lease the park for diamond production. Before doing so, the department sought to approve investigatory drilling to determine the park’s commercial potential. Because the state purchased these park lands with LWCFA funds, however, federal law required that they be maintained as a public outdoor recreational space unless the National Park Service (NPS) authorized their conversion to a different use. The department requested the NPS find that temporary investigatory drilling would not result in a conversion to a different use, and the NPS agreed. The Sierra Club and other environmental organizations (collectively, Sierra Club) (plaintiffs) sued the department and the NPS (collectively, agencies) (defendants) arguing that exploratory drilling could not be separated from the state’s larger goal of commercial mining in the park, and therefore, exploratory drilling constituted an unlawful conversion under the LWCFA. The NPS countered that the drilling was only temporary and would not limit the public’s recreational uses of the park except for a narrow timeframe. The mining companies involved in the park project intervened. The district court agreed with the Sierra Club and issued a preliminary injunction. The mining companies appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Magill, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.