Silver Hills Country Club v. Sobieski
California Supreme Court
55 Cal. 2d 811, 13 Cal. Rptr. 186, 361 P.2d 906 (1961)
- Written by Steven Pacht, JD
Facts
Partners attempting to launch a new for-profit country club (the partners) (defendants) raised money for the project through the sale of memberships in the club and planned to sell additional memberships to raise more money. The partners opened the club’s swimming pool and certain other amenities, with other features, including a golf course, still in development. The club’s membership application and bylaws stated that members had no right to the club’s income or assets. Memberships could be revoked only if a purchaser misbehaved or failed to pay periodic dues. California Commissioner of Corporations John Sobieski (commissioner) (plaintiff) issued a desist-and-refrain order, based on his determination that the memberships were securities under § 25008 of California’s Corporations Securities Act (state securities law). The partners moved to vacate the commissioner’s order, which he denied. The partners appealed to the state superior court, which overturned the commissioner’s decision and issued a writ of mandate to compel the commissioner to vacate the order. The commissioner appealed, arguing that the memberships were securities because (1) they conferred a beneficial interest in the club and (2) purchasers of memberships faced the kinds of risks that the state securities law was intended to protect against. The partners responded that memberships did not give purchasers any right to the club’s assets or income and that memberships were not purchased for investment but to enjoy the club.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Traynor, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.