Simonsen v. Bremby

2015 WL 9451031 (2015)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Simonsen v. Bremby

United States District Court for the District of Connecticut
2015 WL 9451031 (2015)

Facts

Dawn Simonsen (plaintiff), a 57-year-old quadriplegic, was a resident of the Hospital for Special Care requiring ventilator care since October 2013. Simonsen had received Medicaid benefits from the Connecticut Department of Social Services (DSS) to pay for her care since March 2014, but her benefits were terminated in June 2015 based on DSS’s determination that she was ineligible. The determination was based upon the classification of two former trusts of which Simonsen was beneficiary. Simonsen’s mother, Joy A. Miller, had established the Dawn Simonsen GST Trust and the Dawn Simonsen Residuary Trust (predecessor trusts). The trusts were established in Florida and funded upon Miller’s death in April 2003. The trusts provided that the trustee would pay Simonsen, or use for her benefit, the income and principal as the trustee deemed necessary and advisable for her health, reasonable comfort, education, and best interests, considering the fact that she had a substance-abuse problem and that Miller did not want the funds to be used for that purpose. An application for Medicaid benefits for Simonsen was made in July 2014, and in August 2014, the trustee requested an order from the probate court that the trustee could invade the principal as necessary and transfer, or decant, the assets in the predecessor trusts to two new trusts called the Dawn Simonsen Third Party Special Needs Trust I and Trust II (successor trusts). The probate court granted the order, and the predecessor trusts’ combined value of over $1,000,000 was transferred to the successor trusts in November 2014. DSS issued a final-decision notice to the effect that because of the trust-to-trust transfer, there would be a penalty period from September 1, 2014, to September 5, 2021, during which time DSS would not pay for Simonsen’s long-term care. Simonsen sought a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction to prevent DSS commissioner Roderick L. Bremby (defendant) from treating the trusts as available resources in determining her eligibility for Medicaid when they were decanted to the successor trusts and from treating that decanting as disqualifying transfers of assets.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bolden, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership