Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
  • S
  • Sorichetti v. City of New YorkSorichetti v. City of New York
From our private database of 16,800+ case briefs...

Sorichetti v. City of New York

New York Court of Appeals
482 N.E.2d 70 (1985)


Facts

Frank Sorichetti attacked and mutilated his six-year-old daughter Dina while police ignored her mother’s pleas for help. Josephine Sorichetti had obtained three restraining orders against her drunken, violent husband because he attacked and threatened her. Frank also destroyed everything in their apartment when served divorce papers—but the police refused to arrest him, because “he lived there.” The court ultimately entered a final protection order for one year, but gave Frank visitation with Dina from 10 a.m. Saturdays to 6 p.m. Sundays. The following Saturday, when Josephine brought Dina to the local police precinct as directed, Frank threatened to kill Josephine and injure Dina. Josephine immediately reported Frank’s threats to the police, but the police did nothing. Josephine returned at 5:30 p.m. the next day distraught with the protection order, which authorized the police to arrest Frank for any violation and assist in protecting Josephine, but was told to wait outside until 6 p.m. When Frank did not show, the police told Josephine to wait longer. Josephine continued to plead with the police to take immediate action. But at 7 p.m., the police simply took Josephine’s phone number and told her to go home. Meanwhile, Frank attacked Dina with a knife, fork, and a screwdriver, and attempted to saw off her leg. Josephine and Dina (plaintiffs) sued the City of New York (City) (defendant) based on the police’s failure to take any action. The jury returned a verdict for Josephine and Dina. The City appealed, arguing it had no duty to protect Dina.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Alexander, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 449,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 449,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 16,800 briefs, keyed to 224 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers


Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial