Stagl v. Delta Air Lines

117 F.3d 76 (1997)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Stagl v. Delta Air Lines

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
117 F.3d 76 (1997)

Facts

Eleanor Stagl (plaintiff) was a passenger on a flight operated by Delta Air Lines, Inc. (Delta) (defendant). In the baggage-claim area, the flight’s passengers were pushing and shoving to retrieve bags. Delta did not provide any signs or personnel to discourage this behavior. In the chaos, a bag was bumped into Stagl, knocking her down and breaking her hip. Stagl sued Delta for negligence. The trial court found that Delta did not owe Stagl a duty to maintain a safe baggage-retrieval area and granted summary judgment to Delta. Stagl appealed. The appellate court found that Delta did owe Stagl a duty, and the case was remanded for trial. At trial, the court excluded Stagl’s evidence about the airport conditions around the baggage carousel as irrelevant. The trial court also excluded testimony from Stagl’s expert mechanical-engineer witness because, although the witness had expertise in human-machine interactions, he did not have specific experience with airline-baggage systems. At the end of the trial, the trial court directed a verdict for Delta on the grounds that Stagl had not presented any evidence of similar, prior accidents. The trial court believed that prior-accident evidence was necessary to show that the accident was foreseeable, which was an element of Stagl’s negligence claim. Stagl appealed the evidentiary rulings and the directed verdict.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Calabresi, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 781,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 781,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 781,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership