State v. Norman
North Carolina Court of Appeals
89 N.C. App. 384, 366 S.E.2d 586 (1988)
- Written by Sara Rhee, JD
Facts
On June 12, 1985, Norman (defendant) shot and killed her husband while he was asleep in bed. At trial, Norman revealed that her husband physically and verbally abused her for the past twenty years. Her husband was an alcoholic who frequently beat her, threw objects at her, and sometimes did not let her eat for days. He was out of work and forced Norman to prostitute herself on a daily basis, beating her if she resisted or if she did not bring home enough money. On many occasions, he threatened to kill or seriously injure Norman. Norman testified that when she had previously attempted to run away, her husband always found her and beat her. He threatened that if she ever had him sent to jail, he would kill her upon release. Norman also testified that she believed her husband would kill her as soon as the opportunity arose. At trial, expert witnesses testified that Norman suffered from battered spouse syndrome and that she truly believed she had no choice but to kill her husband to protect her and her family. Norman sought to argue that she killed in self-defense, but the trial court declined to issue an instruction on self-defense to the jury because Norman’s husband was not threatening her life at the time Norman killed him.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Parker, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.