State v. Norman

324 N.C. 253, 378 S.E.2d 8 (1989)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Norman

North Carolina Supreme Court
324 N.C. 253, 378 S.E.2d 8 (1989)

State v. Norman

Facts

For most of her 25-year marriage, Norman (defendant) was badly abused by her husband, including being punched and kicked, having objects thrown at her, being burned with cigarettes and hot coffee, and being forced to eat pet food from a bowl on the floor. Norman’s husband also forced her into prostitution at a local truck stop, humiliated her in public, and constantly threatened to kill her. After being beaten very badly one day, Norman called the police. The police refused to arrest her husband unless Norman filed a complaint, which she was afraid to do. An hour later, Norman attempted suicide, and when the paramedics arrived, Norman’s husband insisted that they let her die. Norman sought guidance from a mental-health center and then a social-services office, but Norman’s husband followed her to the social-services office, dragged her out of the interview, took her home, beat her, and burned her with cigarettes. Shortly thereafter, Norman obtained a pistol and shot and killed her husband while he was asleep. Norman was charged with first-degree murder. During the trial, Norman's expert witness, Dr. Tyson, testified that Norman believed she was doomed to a life of torture and abuse leading to her “inevitable” death. Norman also testified that she believed her husband would kill her if he had the chance. Norman was convicted of voluntary manslaughter and sentenced to six years’ imprisonment, and she appealed. The appellate court reversed and granted a new trial on the ground that Norman exhibited battered-wife syndrome and therefore the trial court should have submitted to the jury a possible verdict of acquittal by reason of perfect self-defense. The North Carolina Supreme Court granted review of the case.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Mitchell, J.)

Dissent (Martin, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership