State v. Quick

659 N.W.2d 701 (2003)

From our private database of 47,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Quick

Minnesota Supreme Court
659 N.W.2d 701 (2003)

Facts

Jon Quick (defendant) became aware that his estranged wife, Diane Quick, was spending increasing amounts of time with another man, Justin Mueller. Jon sent Diane several angry emails, which included threats against Mueller. One night, Jon drove 15 miles to the house where Diane lived, bringing a loaded rifle. Before parking, Jon drove around the block to avoid being seen by a neighbor. Jon accessed the home through a window, removed his shoes to minimize noise, went upstairs to the bedroom, and fatally shot Mueller. When Jon was tried for the killing, he testified that he originally intended only to scare and humiliate Mueller, but that he was driven to greater anger by hearing Diane giggle in an intimate manner as he approached the bedroom. The jury was instructed on first-degree murder and first-degree heat-of-passion manslaughter. Jon was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life in prison. Jon appealed, arguing that the state (plaintiff) had failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he had not acted in the heat of passion. The Minnesota Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Anderson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 899,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,000 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 899,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,000 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership