State v. Thomason

2001 Ok. Cr. 27, 33 P.3d 930 (2001)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

State v. Thomason

Oklahoma Criminal Court of Appeals
2001 Ok. Cr. 27, 33 P.3d 930 (2001)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

George Roberts, a 91-year-old resident of the Western Hills Health Care Center (WHHCC) nursing home, fell and broke his leg. Roberts suffered from Alzheimer’s dementia. Roberts was a Medicaid patient, and WHHCC was a Medicaid-certified facility. Roberts’s broken leg was treated at the hospital, and then he was returned to WHHCC. Over the next month, Roberts’s broken leg became severely infected because caretakers allowed urine to leak into the cast. Roberts died from the infection. Michael Dewey, an investigator from Oklahoma’s (plaintiff) Medicaid Fraud Control Unit, visited WHHCC to investigate the circumstances surrounding Roberts’s death. While Dewey was at WHHCC, he saw a photograph of another patient with a severely infected bedsore. However, even after Dewey obtained a search warrant, WHHCC refused to give Dewey information, identification, or records related to the photographed patient, stating that Dewey was not entitled to the records because the patient was not a Medicaid patient. Patsy Thomason (defendant) was the regional director of the Tutera Group, which managed WHHCC. The State of Oklahoma charged Thomason with (1) caretaker neglect, alleging that WHHCC’s neglect caused Roberts’s death; and (2) obstruction, arguing that WHHCC was required to release all patient records requested during a Medicaid Fraud Control Unit institutional abuse investigation. Thomason countered, arguing that (a) she did not fall within the definition of a caretaker under the caretaker-neglect statute; and (b) the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit could not demand records for non-Medicaid patients because of patient confidentiality. The trial court dismissed Oklahoma’s charges against Thomason. Oklahoma appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Strubhar, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 806,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership