Steber v. Norris

206 N.W. 173 (1925)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Steber v. Norris

Wisconsin Supreme Court
206 N.W. 173 (1925)

Facts

Wilmer Steber (plaintiff) was an 11-year-old boy who worked on Mr. Norris’s (defendant) farm. Prior to working there, Steber’s mother gave Mr. Norris written permission to discipline Steber if necessary. One summer, while Steber was working, he failed to complete all his assigned tasks. As a result, Mr. Norris used corporal punishment with a rubber whip on Steber’s bare back to discipline him. Mr. Norris struck Steber dozens of times with the whip, and Steber brought suit against Mr. Norris for the discipline. During the trial, several physicians testified to the existence of stripes, abrasions, and scabs along Steber’s back and thighs. Additionally, multiple witnesses testified to the longevity of the marks and bruises, indicating they were severe. Mr. Norris claimed he had the authority to whip Steber because of the permission from Steber’s mother. At the trial, the jury was instructed that authority figures may adopt rules to promote discipline and may administer reasonable, not excessive, corporal punishment. The jury found for Steber and awarded him $1 in damages. Steber requested that the trial court increase the amount of damages, and the trial court refused. Steber appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Jones, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership