Steel & Morris v. United Kingdom

App. No. 68416/01, Eur. Ct. H.R. 2005-II, 41 E.H.R.R. 22 (2005)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Steel & Morris v. United Kingdom

European Court of Human Rights
App. No. 68416/01, Eur. Ct. H.R. 2005-II, 41 E.H.R.R. 22 (2005)

Facts

London Greenpeace distributed a leaflet that condemned McDonald’s (plaintiff) as exploitative, greedy, and unhealthy. McDonald’s sued several Greenpeace members, including Helen Steel and David Morris (defendants), for defamation. According to United Kingdom law, legal aid was unavailable in defamation proceedings. In the ensuing longest trial in English legal history, Steel and Morris primarily represented themselves with sporadic legal help. The trial judge awarded McDonald’s tens of thousands in damages. Steel and Morris appealed to the Court of Appeal, which reduced the damages to about GBP 40,000 due from each Steel and Morris. Steel and Morris were not granted leave to appeal to the House of Lords. Steel and Morris then appealed to the European Court of Human Rights, arguing that the United Kingdom violated their rights under the European Convention on Human Rights (the convention). In particular, Steel and Morris alleged a violation of Article 6(1) of the convention because the lack of legal aid had violated their right to a fair trial and a violation of Article 10 because their freedom of expression had been unnecessarily interfered with.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership