Stockett v. Tolin
United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida
791 F. Supp. 1536 (1992)
Michelle Ann Stockett (plaintiff), 29 years old, was employed by three related and substantially integrated companies—Limelite Studios, Inc., Directors Production Company, and Limelite Video, Inc. (collectively, Corporate Defendants) (defendants)—from December 1985 through April 1987. Corporate Defendants were closely held companies run and substantially owned by Frank Tolin (defendant), a 71-year-old man. Tolin routinely and frequently touched and spoke to Stockett in a vulgar, sexual manner. The physical incidents included Tolin pressing against Stockett so that she was unable to move, groping her breasts, sticking his tongue in her ears, and licking her neck. Verbally, Tolin frequently made explicit, coarse, and degrading comments about having sex with Stockett. In all instances, Stockett resisted Tolin’s advances but remained on the job because she needed the work and wanted to gain experience in the industry. Tolin was extremely successful, having a net worth in the tens of millions. Employees of Tolin’s companies were well aware of his sexual conduct. Nearly all female employees had been subject to his overtures, and there were numerous witnesses to Tolin’s harassment of Stockett. In April 1987, Tolin threatened Stockett with termination if she did not sleep with him. Stockett quit. She sued Tolin and Corporate Defendants, alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act as well as battery, invasion of privacy, false imprisonment, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Stockett provided evidence of past and ongoing effects from Tolin’s conduct including gastrointestinal conditions, loss of self-confidence, and an inability to trust men. The parties agreed to a nonjury trial.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Marcus, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.