Suffolk County Patrolmen's Benevolent Association v. Commissioner

77 T.C. 1314 (1981)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Suffolk County Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court
77 T.C. 1314 (1981)

Facts

The Suffolk County Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association (the association) (plaintiff), a tax-exempt organization, was the collective-bargaining agent for the police officers of Suffolk County, New York. The association was also actively involved in various community-service projects. As a fundraising venture, the association contracted with a producer to sponsor several professional vaudeville-type shows over a period of six years with plans to continue the event on an annual basis indefinitely. The association sponsored multiple shows during one weekend each year. The producer supplied, without cost to the association, the cast for the shows, as well as the venue, equipment, and promotions for the events. The association provided ticket takers, ushers, and other support. The association received a percentage of the revenue the shows generated from ticket sales and the sale of advertisements in programs that were distributed at the shows. During the years in question, the shows were the association’s only fundraising activity aside from the collection of membership dues. The commissioner of internal revenue (commissioner) (defendant) determined that the association’s earnings from the shows constituted unrelated business taxable income (UBTI), defined as gross income derived from any trade or business regularly carried on by the organization that is unrelated to its exempt purposes. The association challenged the commissioner’s determination, arguing that even if the shows were a trade or business, they were not regularly carried on.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Forrester, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership