Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Suprenant v. State

Court of Appeals of Indiana
925 N.E.2d 1280 (2010)


Facts

Jack Suprenant (defendant) suspected that partner Kerry Bruckman was having an affair. The couple argued for several days until Bruckman decided to leave with Suprenant’s children. Bruckman told Suprenant the relationship was over and began to pack some belongings. Suprenant pleaded with Bruckman to stay. When Bruckman refused, Suprenant became enraged and began stabbing Bruckman. Bruckman’s screaming awakened the children, who ran into the couple’s bedroom. Suprenant chased the children back to bed, returned to the couple’s bedroom, and continued to stab Bruckman until Bruckman died. At Suprenant’s murder trial, the court refused to instruct the jury on voluntary manslaughter. The court found Bruckman’s statement that the relationship was over insufficient to support a finding that Suprenant committed the murder in a sudden heat under the voluntary-manslaughter statute. A jury convicted Suprenant of murder. Suprenant appealed, arguing that Bruckman’s words—combined with Bruckman’s gathering of her belongings—constituted sufficient provocation to warrant a jury instruction on manslaughter.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Bailey, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.