Sutcliffe Storage & Warehouse Co. v. United States
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
162 F.2d 849 (1947)
- Written by John Waller, JD
Facts
On April 13, 1942, Sutcliffe Storage & Warehouse Co. (plaintiff) executed a lease of certain property to the United States Navy that was effective until June 30, 1943. The original lease was subsequently renewed by three renewal leases. Each renewal lease was for a period identical to that of the original lease. On June 15, 1942, the Navy allegedly began to occupy and use additional premises that were not included in the leases. In February 1946, Sutcliffe brought four actions against the United States (defendant) in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts seeking damages for the Navy’s occupancy and use of the additional premises. Each action claimed damages of less than $10,000, and covered a period corresponding to one of the leases, with the first action covering the period from June 15, 1942 to June 30, 1943. The district court granted the United States’ motions to dismiss the three actions covering the periods that corresponded to the renewal leases, on the grounds that they were brought for inseparable parts of the claim in the first action. Sutcliffe appealed, arguing that the general rule against splitting causes of action does not apply here because if it is precluded from trying these actions separately, it will be forced to bring suit in the Court of Claims in Washington under 28 U.S.C.A. § 41(20), because its claims will aggregate to more than $10,000.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Clark, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.