Tagger v. Strauss Group, Ltd.

951 F.3d 124 (2020)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Tagger v. Strauss Group, Ltd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
951 F.3d 124 (2020)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

Benjamin Tagger (plaintiff), an Israeli citizen, was a United States permanent resident who resided in New York. Tagger filed common-law tort and contract claims against Strauss Group, Ltd. (Strauss) (defendant), an Israeli corporation, in federal district court, alleging that Strauss had filed false claims against Tagger in Israel and that those false claims had prevented Tagger from leaving Israel. Strauss moved to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Tagger countered, arguing that the district court had diversity jurisdiction over the action because Strauss was an Israeli corporation and Tagger, by virtue of his permanent residency, could be deemed a New York citizen for diversity purposes. Alternatively, Tagger argued that the 1951 Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation (the FCN treaty) between the United States and Israel guaranteed Israeli nationals favored treatment and access to United States courts. The district court granted Strauss’s motion to dismiss, holding that there was no diversity of citizenship because both Tagger and Strauss were foreign nationals. Tagger appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership