Tanglewood East Homeowners v. Charles-Thomas, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
849 F.2d 1568 (1988)
Facts
For over 25 years, United Creosoting Company (United) ran a wood-treatment facility that caused a significant amount of toxic waste accumulation on property in Montgomery County, Texas. Then, in 1973, residential development began at the property, which became known as the Tanglewood East Subdivision. In 1980, Tanglewood East Homeowners (Tanglewood) (plaintiffs) complained to state authorities about the contaminants. This prompted the Environmental Protection Agency to place the property on the National Priorities List for cleanup under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), causing great expense and inconvenience to Tanglewood. Tanglewood then sued Charles-Thomas, Inc. and others (defendants), including First Federal Savings & Loan Association of Conroe (First Federal) (defendant), along with many real estate developers, agents, agencies, and construction companies (defendants) for damages, response costs, and injunctive relief. The defendants asked the trial court to dismiss the case, claiming that CERCLA does not apply to them, because they did not introduce the contaminants onto the property. The trial court disagreed and denied the dismissal. First Federal appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Politz, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 705,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,300 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
