Tate & Lyle PLC v. Staley Continental Corp.
Delaware Court of Chancery
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 93764 (1988)
![RW](https://quimbee-production.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/educator/photo/115/RichWalter.webp)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Staley Continental Corporation, Inc. (Staley) (defendant) was in no imminent danger of a hostile takeover, but it was reasonable to anticipate a takeover attempt in the near future. To protect themselves against that prospect, Staley’s directors set up a trust fund that would compensate them should a takeover occur. The compensation plan applied equally to Staley’s managerial and nonmanagerial directors. Later, Tate & Lyle PLC (plaintiff) offered to buy out Staley’s shareholders. The offer was contingent on repeal of the directors’ compensation plan. Tate & Lyle also sued Staley’s directors for breaching their fiduciary duty to Staley’s shareholders. Tate & Lyle asked the Delaware Court of Chancery for a preliminary injunction that would block operation of the trust fund.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hartnett, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.