Tessier v. Rockefeller
New Hampshire Supreme Court
33 A.3d 1118 (2011)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Attorney Thomas Tessier handled some estate matters for Dr. Frederick Jakobiec. Jakobiec then hired a second attorney, Regina Rockefeller from the firm Nixon Peabody (defendants), who accused Tessier of misappropriating Jakobiec’s assets. On multiple occasions, Rockefeller met with Tessier and threatened him with disciplinary and criminal proceedings unless he immediately repaid the misappropriated assets. As a result, Tessier’s wife, Lorraine Tessier (plaintiff) claimed that she was forced “under duress” to sign a reverse mortgage and release her homestead interest in the family home as part of a settlement with Jakobiec. Over the next two years, Rockefeller and her firm purportedly “stripped” the Tessiers of all tangible jointly held assets. Despite the settlement agreement, Rockefeller also reported Tessier to his partner, the disciplinary office, and others without notice. Moreover, Jakobiec hired another attorney to sue Attorney Tessier and foreclose on the reverse mortgage. Lorraine Tessier brought suit alleging severe emotional and physical distress requiring hospitalization as a result. The trial court dismissed the fraudulent misrepresentation claim on the ground that Rockefeller and her firm did not owe a legal duty to Lorraine. Lorraine appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Conboy, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.