The Corner, Inc. v. Pinnacle, Inc.
Wyoming Supreme Court
907 P.2d 1281, 31 UCC Rep. Serv. 2d 455 (1995)
- Written by Tom Squier, JD
Facts
The Corner, Inc. (defendant) operated a lounge that provided on-site entertainment for its guests. On September 9, 1993, The Corner signed a lease agreement with Pinnacle, Inc. (plaintiff) for the lease of coin-operated equipment, to include a pool table, a dart board, a jukebox, and two vending machines. The term of the lease was for three years. With regards to the pool table, the agreement provided that The Corner would make a down payment of $400 and pay $250 for 12 months, after which it had the option to purchase the pool table for $1 and pay Pinnacle $75 per month for the remainder of the term. On September 13, 1993, The Corner repudiated the agreement. Pinnacle was able to lease the dartboard to another business but was unable to do so for any of the other equipment. Pinnacle returned the pool table and jukebox to their suppliers, but it incurred a $650 restocking fee. Pinnacle sued for breach of contract and to recover damages. At trial, The Corner admitted to breaching the contract, and the only contested matter was the measure of damages. The trial court awarded damages to Pinnacle calculating the contract price and then deducting the estimated depreciation for the various pieces of equipment. For the pool table, the trial court calculated damages as though The Corner had exercised the purchase option after 12 months and then paid for the service fee for two more years. The Corner appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Thomas, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.