Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

The Gentry Gallery, Inc. v. The Berkline Corp.

134 F.3d 1473 (Fed. Cir. 1998)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 30,500+ case briefs...

The Gentry Gallery, Inc. v. The Berkline Corp.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

134 F.3d 1473 (Fed. Cir. 1998)

Play video

Facts

Many sectional sofas are configured in an L-shape with a reclining seat at either end of the sofa. These reclining seats face different directions and often make it difficult for users to converse or watch a television program without shifting or moving. The Gentry Gallery (“Gentry”) (plaintiff) patented a unit of sectional sofa in which a console was placed between two independent reclining seats facing the same direction, known as the ‘244 patent. The console housed the controls for the reclining seats, eliminating the need to place each recliner at an exposed end of the sofa. In 1991, Gentry filed suit against The Berkline Corporation (“Berkline”) (defendant) alleging that it had infringed on the ‘244 patent by manufacturing and selling sectional sofas that also had two reclining seats facing the same direction, separated by a seat which had a back cushion that could be pivoted down and serve as a tabletop between the recliners. In the Berkline invention, the controls for the recliners were not placed within a console. The U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts granted Berkline’s motion for summary judgment of non-infringement, but denied its motions for summary judgment of invalidity and unenforceability, holding that the ‘244 patent was not invalid and thus enforceable. Berkline appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lourie, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 550,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 550,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 30,500 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 550,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 30,500 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership