Tiesler v. Martin Paint Stores, Inc.
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
76 F.R.D. 640 (1977)

- Written by Mary Phelan D'Isa, JD
Facts
Tiesler (plaintiff) was injured when a can of denatured alcohol exploded and showered Tiesler with burning liquid and injured him. Tiesler brought a products-liability action against Martin Paint Stores (Martin) (defendant) for its failure to comply with federal labeling and packaging requirements and for breach of implied warranty, negligence, and liability under the Restatement of Torts, § 402A. Martin, using Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 14, impleaded Joseph Keller as a third-party defendant and claimed that Keller’s negligent use of the product was the proximate cause of Tiesler’s injuries, so if Martin was found liable to Tiesler, Martin would be entitled to contribution from Keller as a joint tortfeasor. Tiesler moved to dismiss the third-party action because it was not related to his allegations against Martin and because it was based on ordinary negligence principles.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (McGlynn, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.