Tom Growney Equipment v. Ansley

88 P.2d 992 (1994)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
T
From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Tom Growney Equipment v. Ansley

Court of Appeals of New Mexico
88 P.2d 992 (1994)

  • Written by Mary Pfotenhauer, JD

Facts

Jim Ansley (defendant) sold a backhoe on credit to Charles Edwards and retained a security interest it. Edwards brought the backhoe to Tom Growney Equipment, Inc. (Growney) (plaintiff) to be repaired. Growney repaired the backhoe, and Edwards became indebted to Growney for the cost of the repairs. Ansley was not aware of either Growney’s services or the fact that Edwards owed Growney for them. Edwards defaulted on his obligation to Ansley and ultimately failed to pay Growney for the repairs. Ansley repossessed the backhoe from Edwards. Growney sued Ansley for the value of the repair services on the backhoe. The district court entered summary judgment against Ansley on Growney’s claim for quantum meruit damages under a theory of unjust enrichment. Ansley appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bosson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 782,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 782,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 782,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Contracts

Key Terms