From our private database of 33,600+ case briefs...
Tooley v. Martin-Marietta Corp.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
648 F.2d 1239 (1981)
Section 701(j) of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) required an employer to accommodate the religious beliefs of an employee. Section 701(j) was intended to promote Title VII’s broader policy of prohibiting discrimination in employment. The Martin-Marietta Corporation (the company) (defendant) and the United Steelworkers of America, Local 8141 (the union) (defendant) entered into an agreement that obligated the company to discharge all employees who failed to pay dues to the union. Three employees of the company (plaintiffs) were Seventh Day Adventists who, under the tenets of their faith, were prohibited from paying dues to a union. These employees proposed an accommodation under which they would make a contribution equal to the amount of the union dues to a charity agreed upon by both the employees and the union. But the union refused to accept the accommodation. Subsequently, the employees brought suit, contending that the union and the company violated § 701(j). The union and the company asserted that, under the facts of the case, § 701(j) violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. The district court ruled in favor of the employees. The union and the company appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Farris, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 603,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 603,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 33,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.