Topp Paper Co. v. ETI Converting Equipment
United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida
2013 WL 12101111 (2013)
- Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD
Facts
Florida-based Topp Paper Company, LLC (plaintiff) bought a label-printing machine for over $1 million from Canadian company ETI Converting Equipment (defendant). The contract contained a limited 12-month repair-or-replacement warranty, and a choice-of-law clause selecting the laws of Quebec, Canada, as governing. The machine kept malfunctioning, and Topp requested a refund 21 months after its installation. ETI refused the machine’s return and replaced its coating head, making it run substantially better. But Topp claimed that problems with high-speed labels sticking in the machine continued. Ultimately, Topp claimed that the machine stopped working completely and sued for a refund. ETI argued that it had fixed the problems, and a Topp employee said Topp continued using the machine eight hours a day. Topp countered it could not use the machine to make fast application labels for high-volume industries like food, produce, and packaging, undercutting its profits. ETI requested summary judgment finding that it had not fundamentally breached the contract.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Rosenbaum, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.