Town of Jonesville v. Powell Valley Village Limited Partnership
Virginia Supreme Court
487 S.E.2d 207 (1997)
- Written by Samantha Arena, JD
Facts
In 1975, the Virginia General Assembly passed legislation requiring all municipalities to adopt a comprehensive zoning plan. The legislation further required that all zoning ordinances issued thereafter by a municipality be reasonably consistent with the comprehensive plan. In 1989, the Town of Jonesville (plaintiff) passed a zoning ordinance that set zoning classifications for the town. The following year, Powell Valley Village Limited Partnership (defendant) obtained a zoning permit to build apartments in the town. In 1993, the town amended its 1989 zoning ordinance to require a special permit for residential buildings with more than six units. The following year, Powell applied to renew its 1990 permit. The county building inspector denied the permit because Powell did not newly apply for the special-use permit required by the 1993 amendment. Powell filed suit against the town, seeking a declaratory judgment that that the town’s 1989 zoning ordinance and 1993 amendment were invalid because the town had failed to adopt a comprehensive plan prior to issuing zoning ordinances, as required by the general assembly’s 1975 legislation. Powell further requested a writ of mandamus compelling the county inspector to issue the building permit. The trial court found in Powell’s favor, concluding that the town’s zoning ordinance was void for failure to adopt a prior comprehensive plan, and granting the writ. The town appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lacy, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.