Town of Jonesville v. Powell Valley Village Limited Partnership

487 S.E.2d 207 (1997)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Town of Jonesville v. Powell Valley Village Limited Partnership

Virginia Supreme Court
487 S.E.2d 207 (1997)

Facts

In 1975, the Virginia General Assembly passed legislation requiring all municipalities to adopt a comprehensive zoning plan. The legislation further required that all zoning ordinances issued thereafter by a municipality be reasonably consistent with the comprehensive plan. In 1989, the Town of Jonesville (plaintiff) passed a zoning ordinance that set zoning classifications for the town. The following year, Powell Valley Village Limited Partnership (defendant) obtained a zoning permit to build apartments in the town. In 1993, the town amended its 1989 zoning ordinance to require a special permit for residential buildings with more than six units. The following year, Powell applied to renew its 1990 permit. The county building inspector denied the permit because Powell did not newly apply for the special-use permit required by the 1993 amendment. Powell filed suit against the town, seeking a declaratory judgment that that the town’s 1989 zoning ordinance and 1993 amendment were invalid because the town had failed to adopt a comprehensive plan prior to issuing zoning ordinances, as required by the general assembly’s 1975 legislation. Powell further requested a writ of mandamus compelling the county inspector to issue the building permit. The trial court found in Powell’s favor, concluding that the town’s zoning ordinance was void for failure to adopt a prior comprehensive plan, and granting the writ. The town appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Lacy, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 804,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership