Trihotel
Germany Federal Court of Justice
16 July 2007 (2007)
- Written by Curtis Parvin, JD
Facts
A husband (defendant) and wife were the sole shareholders of A-GmbH, a German limited-liability company (GmbH). The husband was the managing director of A-GmbH and two other companies, J-GmbH, with his mother as the sole shareholder, and W-Hotel-GmbH, with his mother and J-GmbH as the only shareholders. A-GmbH leased a hotel property, Trihotel, but later canceled the lease before its contractual termination date and started a new lease for the hotel with J-GmbH as the leasing party. J-GmbH then executed a service agreement for the management of the hotel with a third party (the manager) (plaintiff). The manager incurred significant losses and terminated the service agreement, leaving the hotel to be managed only by J-GmbH. The manager later filed for bankruptcy, as did A-GmbH. The manager filed a claim asserting that the companies owed the manager substantial amounts and that the husband was personally liable for having drained the companies of their assets. The Rostock Court of Appeal ruled against the husband, holding him personally liable for the company debts because the husband essentially destroyed the debtor companies by inappropriately assigning away the companies’ assets as collateral and terminating the lease without justification. The husband appealed to the Germany Federal Court of Justice. [Editor’s Note: The Germany Federal Court of Justice is Germany’s highest civil and criminal jurisdiction court.]
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.