Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status

Turbines Ltd. v. Transupport, Inc.

825 N.W.2d 767 (2013)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 26,900+ case briefs...

Turbines Ltd. v. Transupport, Inc.

Nebraska Supreme Court

825 N.W.2d 767 (2013)

Facts

Turbines, Inc. (Turbines) (plaintiff) was a helicopter sales company. A customer in Singapore named Monarch Aviation (Monarch) wanted to purchase a turbine nozzle from Turbines and have it shipped to Malaysia. Not having a nozzle in its inventory, Turbines ordered a nozzle from Transupport, Inc. (Transupport) (defendant). Turbines paid $30,000 for the nozzle, and Transupport shipped the nozzle to Turbines. Turbines then attempted to ship the nozzle to Malaysia, but the nozzle was confiscated by U.S. Customs. U.S. Customs believed that Turbines needed a license to ship the nozzle to Malaysia. After nearly two years, U.S. Customs determined that no license was required, and returned the nozzle to Turbines. During the time that the nozzle was detained at U.S. Customs, Turbines learned that Monarch was illegally rerouting goods to Iran. Knowing this, Turbines could no longer ship the nozzle to Monarch without facing criminal penalties. Turbines returned the nozzle to Transupport and demanded a refund. Transupport sent the nozzle back to Turbines. Turbines sued Transupport, seeking to have its contract with Transupport rescinded, or legally undone. The district court ruled in favor of Turbines. Transupport appealed. The appeals court reversed the district court’s ruling, finding that the evidence did not support rescission. Turbines appealed to the Nebraska Supreme Court. Turbines argued that, under Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) § 2-615, its performance of the Turbines-Transupport contract was excused by impracticability.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Stephan, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 541,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 541,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 26,900 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 541,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 26,900 briefs - keyed to 983 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership