Logourl black
From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...

Turcotte v. Fell

Court of Appeals of New York
502 N.E.2d 964 (1986)


Facts

Ronald Turcotte was a professional jockey. Turcotte was riding in a race in a facility owned and operated by the New York Racing Association (NYRA). Turcotte had participated in three prior races at the same track on that day. Jeffrey Fell was riding in the lane next to Turcotte, on a horse owned by David Reynolds. Turcotte’s horse tripped and fell, throwing Turcotte to the ground, and causing injuries that left Turcotte a paraplegic. Turcotte and his wife (plaintiffs) sued Fell, Reynolds, and NYRA (defendants). Turcotte argued that Fell breached a duty to use reasonable care to avoid crossing into Turcotte’s lane of travel, in violation of the rules of professional racing; that Reynolds was liable under the doctrine of respondent superior; and that NYRA negligently and improperly watered the racetrack, creating unsafe “cupping” conditions. Turcotte testified that the danger of a horse veering into another lane is inherent in horseracing, and that cupping conditions were common on racetracks and that he had experienced them before. The lower court granted summary judgment in favor of Fell and Reynolds, finding that Turcotte, by engaging in horseracing, relieved the other race participants of any duty of reasonable care relating to horseracing’s known dangers or risks, and that Fell and Reynolds did not engage in reckless or intentionally harmful conduct. The court denied NYRA’s motion for summary judgment, finding that there were questions of fact as to whether it negligently maintained the racetrack. The appellate division affirmed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Simons, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.