Tusch Enterprises v. Coffin

113 Idaho 37 (1987)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Tusch Enterprises v. Coffin

Idaho Supreme Court
113 Idaho 37 (1987)

Facts

Robert and Elizabeth Vander Boegh (defendants) owned land on which they wanted to build three duplexes. The Vander Boeghs contracted with Rex Coffin (defendant), a building contractor, to erect the duplexes. During construction, Coffin became concerned about the softness of the soil and suspected that it was fill dirt, which would be more likely to cause the foundations to crack. Coffin discussed this concern with Robert, who had considerable experience in the construction business. The duplexes were built and then sold to Tusch Enterprises (plaintiff), and Tusch leased them to others. Tusch later discovered that the foundations were cracked due to fill dirt. Tusch had not been informed that fill dirt was used. Tusch filed suit against the Vander Boeghs and Coffin, alleging negligence, misrepresentation, breach of express warranty, and breach of the implied warranty of habitability. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the Vander Boeghs and Coffin on all four counts. Tusch appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Donaldson, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership