Twin Oaks Community, Inc. v. Commissioner

87 T.C. 1233 (1986)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Twin Oaks Community, Inc. v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court
87 T.C. 1233 (1986)

Facts

Twin Oaks Community, Inc. (Twin Oaks) (plaintiff) was a religious organization that owned a large property in Virginia on which it established a community based on the book Walden Two by behavioral psychologist B.F. Skinner. The Twin Oaks community incorporated communal living and work structures. Members engaged in farming for commercial purposes and the community’s domestic needs. Members also engaged in several other trades and businesses. Earnings from the businesses were paid into a community treasury maintained by Twin Oaks and used to meet the needs of the members, including food, housing, and medical care. Twin Oaks considered itself a religious or apostolic association that was exempt under § 501(d) of the Internal Revenue Code (code) and filed income tax returns on Form 1065 (U.S. Partnership Return of Income). Twin Oaks also issued a Schedule K-1 for each member of the community. Section 501(d) defined a religious or apostolic association as an organization with a common treasury or community treasury, which could engage in business for the common benefit of its members, but only if the members included in their gross income their entire pro rata shares, distributed or not, of the organization’s taxable income. The commissioner of internal revenue (commissioner) (defendant) determined that Twin Oaks did not qualify for the § 501(d) exemption. Twin Oaks challenged the determination in the United States Tax Court. The commissioner agreed that Twin Oaks engaged in business for the common benefit of its members and that Twin Oaks’ members included in their gross income as dividends their entire pro rata share of Twin Oaks’ taxable income, regardless of whether such income was distributed to them. The commissioner argued, however, that Twin Oaks did not maintain a common treasury or community treasury because its members did not take a vow of poverty and irrevocably contribute all their property to Twin Oaks.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Parker, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 802,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership