United States ex rel. Bledsoe v. Community Health Systems, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
501 F.3d 493 (2007)
- Written by DeAnna Swearingen, LLM
Facts
Community Health Systems, Inc. (defendant) owned Sparta Hospital Corp., d/b/a White County Community Hospital (White County) (defendant), where Sean Bledsoe (plaintiff) worked. Bledsoe contacted government officials to report the defendants’ fraudulent billing practices and was encouraged to file a qui tam lawsuit. Bledsoe sued under the False Claims Act (FCA), 31 U.S.C. § 3729, alleging the defendants knowingly presented fraudulent claims to Medicaid and Medicare. Bledsoe’s amended complaint named the proper defendants and added claims. Bledsoe alleged the defendants billed for services that did not occur, charged for unbillable procedures, miscoded items, and inflated charges. The district court concluded that FCA claims were fraud claims required to be pled with particularity under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 9(b). The district court dismissed with prejudice, because Bledsoe had time to amend the complaint to meet the particularity requirement. Bledsoe appealed, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reversed, holding that whether FCA claims were fraud claims had been unsettled and dismissal should not have been with prejudice. Bledsoe filed another amended complaint, alleging a “fraudulent scheme” by the defendants and citing examples. The defendants moved to dismiss, and numerous claims were dismissed for failure to plead with particularity under FRCP 9(b) and statute of limitations issues. Bledsoe appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Clay, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 777,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.