United States ex rel. Toth v. Quarles
United States Supreme Court
350 U.S. 11 (1955)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Robert Toth (defendant) was honorably discharged from the United States Air Force and became a civilian. Toth had no continuing relationship with the military. Five months after he was discharged, Toth was arrested by military authorities and charged with murder. The murder had allegedly occurred while Toth was on active duty and stationed in Korea. The United States civilian courts lacked jurisdiction to hear the charges because the murder had occurred in a different country. However, a federal statute allowed former servicemembers to be court-martialed for crimes that occurred while the servicemembers were in the service. Under this statutory authority, a court-martial was convened to hear the charges against Toth. Toth contested the constitutionality of the statute and the court-martial, arguing that a military court could never constitutionally exercise personal jurisdiction over a civilian. The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit found that the court-martial could exercise personal jurisdiction over Toth in these circumstances. The United States Supreme Court agreed to review the matter.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Black, J.)
Dissent (Reed, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 834,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.