United States Trust Co. v. Internal Revenue Service
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
803 F.2d 1363 (1986)

- Written by Joe Cox, JD
Facts
Alexander Chisolm died in 1974. In his will, he left 10 percent of his gross estate to the Chisholm Foundation, a tax-exempt organization. The 10 percent amounted to $2,473,719. The funds were paid out by his estate in 1975 and 1976. On the estate’s federal estate-tax return, the executor, United States Trust Company (plaintiff), claimed an estate-tax deduction for the entire bequest, which was allowed by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) (defendant). The estate also filed an income-tax return and claimed an income-tax deduction for $1,240,467 of the cash distributions made to the Chisholm Foundation as a deduction for distributions made to a beneficiary. The IRS disallowed the deduction. The IRS argued that by including the charitable contributions within the gross estate for estate-tax-deduction purposes, the estate could not then receive an income-tax deduction from paying those sums to beneficiaries. While a deduction could be given for estate income paid to beneficiaries, this was not so for all funds paid. A treasury regulation provided that an entity that took the income-tax deduction for a charitable gift could not also take the income tax deduction for distribution to a beneficiary. The estate paid the additional taxes and then filed suit for a refund. The trial court heard cross-motions for summary judgment and ruled for the estate. The IRS appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hill, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.