United States v. Beaty
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
722 F.2d 1090 (1983)
The United States government (plaintiff) successfully prosecuted William Beaty and John Ballouz (defendants) for several offenses arising from an unsuccessful drug smuggling operation. Both Beaty and Ballouz appealed their convictions to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, claiming prejudicial error. Beaty claimed that the trial judge improperly questioned a government witness in order to rehabilitate her testimony at a particularly sensitive point in the trial. Beaty also claimed the judge prejudicially implied skepticism of her case by frequently rejecting and rebuking defense counsel's attempt to introduce evidence. Ballouz claimed that the trial judge prejudiced the jury through extended hostile questioning of Ballouz's witnesses.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Hunter, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 177,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.