United States v. Foster
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
711 F.2d 871 (1982)
- Written by Abby Roughton, JD
Facts
Gregory Foster, Johnnie Gibson, Billy Jackson, and Ronald Wilson were charged with crimes based on their involvement in a heroin-trafficking conspiracy. At trial, the United States (plaintiff) sought to introduce into evidence a cooperating witness’s business ledger, which contained records of drug transactions between her and Gibson. The witness testified that she recorded most of her large drug transactions and that her regular practice was to write in the ledger how many balloons of heroin went out on a given day and how much money she received. The witness recorded the transactions at or near the time they occurred. The ledger did not contain a record of every heroin transaction, and some of the transactions were recorded out of order. In addition, the ledger contained some blank pages and unrelated entries. However, information in the ledger implicated Gibson in the drug-trafficking conspiracy. The court admitted the ledger into evidence under the business-records exception to the hearsay rule set forth in Federal Rule of Evidence 803(6). Gibson and others were convicted, and they appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. One of Gibson’s arguments on appeal was that the trial court improperly admitted the ledger into evidence.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Alarcon, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.