United States v. Leonard

529 F.3d 83 (2008)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Leonard

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
529 F.3d 83 (2008)

United States v. Leonard

Facts

Paul Dickau and Nanci Silverstein (defendants) operated independent sales offices that sold interests in several limited liability corporations (LLCs). These LLCs were created to produce motion pictures. Dickau and Silverstein solicited investments in the LLCs and mailed offering materials to potential investors. The offering materials included documents indicating that investors would play an active role in the management of the LLCs. However, the investors were actually given a very passive role in the management of the LLCs. The investors rarely voted, were not given an opportunity to negotiate the terms of the investment agreement, and did not accrue managerial rights until the LLCs were fully organized. Additionally, the investors were not required to have any particular experience in the film industry. Whenever an interest was sold in the LLCs, Dickau and Silverstein would receive a commission. The government charged Dickau and Silverstein with securities and mail fraud. In district court, a jury returned a verdict finding Dickau and Silverstein guilty of securities and mail fraud, based on Dickau’s and Silverstein’s failure to accurately disclose the sales commissions that were received. This disclosure is mandatory under securities laws. Dickau and Silverstein appealed, asserting that the investments in the LLCs did not constitute securities.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Katzmann, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 779,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 779,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 779,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership