United States v. Lopez
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
913 F.3d 807 (2019)
- Written by Abby Roughton, JD
Facts
Lashay Marie Lopez (defendant) was charged with crimes relating to her purchase of a firearm using false identification. Lopez admitted to purchasing a handgun with her twin sister’s identification, but she asserted an affirmative defense of duress. Lopez claimed that she purchased the handgun for Hector Karaca because Karaca had threatened to harm Lopez and her family if she did not get a gun for him. Lopez sought to introduce expert testimony from Dr. Cheryl Karp regarding battered-woman syndrome and the effects of past abuse on a person’s behavior. Lopez had been physically and sexually abused by her stepfather, and she argued that Karp’s testimony could help the jury understand Lopez’s behavior and her fear of Karaca. The district court ruled that Karp’s testimony was irrelevant to Lopez’s duress defense and excluded the evidence. However, the court allowed Lopez to testify about how her past experiences with abuse affected her perceptions of Karaca. Lopez was convicted, and she appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bybee, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.