United States v. Naftalin
United States Supreme Court
441 U.S. 768 (1979)
- Written by Robert Cane, JD
Facts
Neil Naftalin (defendant) was the president of a broker-dealer firm. Naftalin engaged in a scheme of short-selling stocks. Naftalin placed orders with five brokers to sell shares of select stocks. However, Naftalin did not own the shares of stock that he had placed orders to sell, so he falsely represented to the brokers that he owned the shares. Unfortunately for Naftalin, the stocks increased in price, and he was unable to deliver the shares that he had offered for sale because he did not own the shares. Consequently, the brokers had to purchase replacement shares of stock for the purchasers of the shares that Naftalin had placed for sale. The United States (plaintiff) prosecuted Naftalin for violations of § 17(a)(1) of the Securities Act of 1933 (1933 act). Naftalin was convicted of eight counts of employing a scheme and artifice to defraud in the sale of securities. The appellate court vacated Naftalin’s convictions. The appellate court found that the purpose of the 1933 act was to protect investors from fraud, so because Naftalin’s fraud injured brokers, not investors, Naftalin did not violate § 17(a)(1). The United States appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Brennan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.