United States v. Olin Corp.
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
107 F.3d 1506 (1997)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
Alabama-based Olin Corporation (plaintiff) manufactured commercial chemicals that contaminated segments of Olin’s property, referred to as OU-1. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (plaintiff) filed suit in federal district court seeking an order to require Olin to clean up OU-1 pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). Prior to approving a consent order agreed to by the parties in which Olin agreed to pay all costs associated with the cleanup, the district court required the parties to address whether the U.S. Supreme Court’s holding in United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 (1995), had any effect on the consent order. Olin responded that CERCLA could not constitutionally impose liability for conduct predating the statute’s enactment. The district court agreed and dismissed EPA’s suit. EPA appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Kravitch, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.